<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[wolfSSL - Embedded SSL Library — Symmetric crypto on windows 10]]></title>
		<link>https://www.wolfssl.com/forums/topic1741-symmetric-crypto-on-windows-10.html</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.wolfssl.com/forums/feed-rss-topic1741.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Symmetric crypto on windows 10.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 12:51:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Symmetric crypto on windows 10]]></title>
			<link>https://www.wolfssl.com/forums/post6015.html#p6015</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hadrien,</p><p>The benefit of working with the TPM simulator is that the code you write using wolfTPM will be exactly the same when you switch to a physical, dedicated TPM chip on the real hardware.</p><p>Please let me know if you have more questions.</p><p>Thanks,<br />Dimi</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dimitom)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 12:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.wolfssl.com/forums/post6015.html#p6015</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Symmetric crypto on windows 10]]></title>
			<link>https://www.wolfssl.com/forums/post6014.html#p6014</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you <strong>Dimi</strong>, <br />but, is there something more&nbsp; in using a simulator than using my former software lib crypto ?</p><p>Hadrien</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Grizzy Kret)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 11:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.wolfssl.com/forums/post6014.html#p6014</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Symmetric crypto on windows 10]]></title>
			<link>https://www.wolfssl.com/forums/post6005.html#p6005</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hadrien,</p><p>Typically, symmetric key operations are restricted on TPM due to export regulations(law).</p><p>However, you could still develop and test these operations using a TPM Simulator.</p><p>Please check out our documentation for how to develop using a TPM simulator - <a href="https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfTPM/blob/master/docs/SWTPM.md">https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfTPM/blob … s/SWTPM.md</a></p><p>Thanks,<br />Dimi</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dimitom)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 18:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.wolfssl.com/forums/post6005.html#p6005</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Symmetric crypto on windows 10]]></title>
			<link>https://www.wolfssl.com/forums/post6003.html#p6003</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I&#039;m trying to cipher using AES with any possible mode, and here is what I get :<br />For all modes except CFB, <strong>wolfTPM2_CreateAndLoadKey</strong> returns an error 713 (&quot;Mode of operation not supported&quot;).<br />Not pleasant, but at least, standard.<br />(I think this is because of my Infineon ship that implements CFB only...)</p><p>For CFB, <strong>wolfTPM2_CreateAndLoadKey</strong> is successful, but then, <strong>wolfTPM2_EncryptDecrypt</strong> returns an error 0x80280400 which is not even a standard TPM code!<br />After a while, I found out that it is a pure windows code for &quot;blocked command&quot;.</p><p>So, if I haven&#039;t missed anything, I can&#039;t do any symmetric ciphering...<br />I&#039;m using a code very similar to the <em>bench</em> exemple here : <a href="https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfTPM/blob/2f00a4b7355588ba2dfc9ef5fd813e085cf33d76/examples/bench/bench.c#L149">https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfTPM/blob … nch.c#L149</a>.</p><p>Any idea ?<br />Thanks in advance!</p><p>Hadrien</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Grizzy Kret)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 18:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.wolfssl.com/forums/post6003.html#p6003</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
