Crypto-Agility in the LMS Private Key

Here at wolfSSL, we have enhanced our Leighton-Micali Signature (LMS) implementation with a new optional state serialization feature that significantly improves key reload performance for applications requiring frequent signing operations. The LMS post-quantum signature scheme is stateful by nature, meaning each signature operation updates the internal state of the private key, and this state must […]

Read MoreMore Tag

ML-KEM hybrid TLS 1.3 Codepoint Backwards Compatibility

Here at wolfSSL, we have merged an important pull request addressing backward compatibility for post-quantum cryptography in TLS 1.3. This enhancement focuses on ML-KEM (Module-Lattice-Based Key Encapsulation Mechanism) codepoints, ensuring seamless interoperability between wolfSSL versions across the 5.8.0 release boundary. Prior to version 5.8.0, wolfSSL used specific codepoint identifiers for hybrid key exchange algorithms combining […]

Read MoreMore Tag

Coming Soon: wolfSSL Takes PQC Toward FIPS Certification

wolfSSL is taking proactive steps to get our PQC implementations for FIPS 203 (ML-KEM), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) LMS (verify-only) and XMSS (verify-only) validated through NIST. These standards define quantum-resistant key exchange and digital signature algorithms that meet the CNSA 2.0 transition requirements for government and regulated industries. FIPS certification is the gold standard for cryptographic […]

Read MoreMore Tag

LMS Versus XMSS Versus SLH-DSA

Here at wolfSSL, we don’t just love coding! We love telling the world about what we code. To that end, we want you to understand the differences between LMS, XMSS, and SLH-DSA. Here are their official standard specifications: LMS (Leighton-Micali Hash-Based Signatures) XMSS (eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme) SLH-DSA (Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard) The most […]

Read MoreMore Tag

ML-KEM Versus HQC KEM

ML-KEM (Module-Lattice Key Encapsulation Mechanism) and HQC (Hamming Quasi-Cyclic) are both post-quantum cryptographic key encapsulation mechanisms (KEMs) designed to provide secure key exchange in the presence of CRQCs (Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers). ML-KEM is based on the (M-LWE) Module Learning With Errors problem, which involves finding a short vector between two points in a high […]

Read MoreMore Tag

Coming soon: HQC KEM

Hello there! You! We know you are out there. You learned about Hamming codes in college or university, and maybe even use them in your professional career in consumer electronics or telecommunications. Now you are wondering how simple error correcting codes can be transformed into a KEM (Key Encapsulation Mechanism) for doing secure key transport. […]

Read MoreMore Tag

ML-KEM Versus ML-DSA

ML-KEM (Module Lattice Key Encapsulation Mechanism) is for secure key exchange. ML-KEM enables two parties to establish a shared secret key over an insecure channel. ML-DSA (Module Lattice Digital Signature Algorithm) is for authentication. ML-DSA allows a signer to generate a digital signature that can be verified by others, ensuring the authenticity and integrity of […]

Read MoreMore Tag

Posts navigation

1 2